Welp, I saw Avatar 2: The Way of Water and, without fear of spoilers of any kind, I can say that it 100% met my expectations. I was HOPING the story would be a little less “My-First-Adventure-Book” than the first, but was fully prepared for it to just be another ‘good guys vs bad guys’ as an excuse to stage 1 part stunning nature documentary and 1 part big blow-em-up action movie. That’s exactly what I got, and boy oh boy, are the nature doc and action movie spectacular.
I saw it in 3D, which cemented my feeling that Cameron is, in fact, the only big name director that knows how the hell to do it properly. His experiments with High Frame Rate are… more of a mixed bag, but even that is a drastic improvement on previous tries with The Hobbit series and Ang Lee’s Billy Lynd’s Long Halftime Walk and Gemini Man.
What is NOT up for debate is the sheer technical achievement on display, and the jaw-dropping visual results. Yes, it’s 3+ hours long. Yes, some of the dialog is… not great. But while I could quibble with the plot, or characters, or performances, I must marvel that I am quibbling with the performance of 10 foot tall blue cat people. And if I have have reservations on how two of them look having a fight on a sinking hovercraft at 48 frames per second, I am never for a second doubting that I AM, in fact, seeing two 10 foot blue cat people fighting on a sinking hovercraft.
Do not expect Indiana Jones - level charm, or Star Wars - level “golly gee whiz” enthusiasm. But I think a current writer in Slate has it exactly right:
" To see a James Cameron movie is to remember that in rare cases it does not matter whether a film is good so long as the film is fucking awesome, and those are the cases on which Cameron has built his filmography. That some of his movies are also good—the Terminator films, Aliens, The Abyss—is more a matter of coincidence."
I’ve linked the article below, but it’s picking things apart in a way that, while interesting, I don’t necessarily agree with. But the quote above I endorse 100%.