I don’t need scientific theories either. I know what works better for me and what tastes better for me and there is no scientific fact or theory that replaces that. What tastes better to me or anyone else can’t be quantified.
I’ll be posting about my best experiences with clay pot cooking, and I won’t be comparing them with cooking by any other method.
Thank you both. That monkfish recipe I just posted is delicious and unusual and works well no matter what pot you cook it in. Just apply the heat gradually
I couldn’t find a price on it. That’s another reason I didn’t buy it. I don’t like being suspected (silently) of having removed a price tag. Also don’t like being sized up by the shift manager who gets called over to price the item when you’re already at the register. The price at that point always seems to be on the high side.
I have an unglazed clay Yunnan soup pot that makes out of this world chicken soup. Would I get the same results in a Dutch oven? I’m not sure, because the way the pot is fashioned allows for a somewhat unique inflow of condensed steam. I love the result.
Yours look like this? I suspect that a traditional Dutch Oven will have a difficult time to reproduce the result just because the mechanisms of cooking are different. If I have to bet, a steamer will have a better chance to reproduce this than a Dutch Oven.
FYI for other people. It is an unique way to steam/double boil the chicken. One major difference from true double boil is that steam is allowed to get inside the vessel and slowly adding liquid to the soup
These can be stacked, so numerous vessels can be used at the same time – much like how you see bamboo steamers can be stacked.
If I’m the Rick you’re talking about, the pots I recommended are from Columbia, not Mexico. The brand is la chamba. They sell some sizes on Amazon for the same prices, including shipping, that they sell direct. Here’s the importer
So what do you think of this cooking vessel – a partial steamer and a partial double boiler.
Clay being a good insulator will reduce heat loss to the environment, and also because clay is a better insulator, the top part of the vessel will be cooler (more thermal gradient from bottom to top) and have better condensation back to the pot.
Not to say this cannot be done with a metal pot, which there are some variations.
You are correct. You can think of this as an adaptor on top of another pot. The bottom can also be a bigger clay pot and that is more likely the case in older time
This one is in fact clay Yunnan steam pot on top of a regular clay pot.
I think that the design will circulate very moist air when lidded, and contain/accumulate what water condenses . The food contents will also get some heat via conduction from the central “stack”.
Here’s tonight’s dinner, just for the two of us sitting at the bar.
Turkish kofte in a Spanish cazuela, bulgur pilaf in a cute little la chamba covered oven. Made the vegetable in a conventional skillet.
I’m guessing you folks can guess at the cost of the demeyere skillet, I think the cazuela cost me eighteen bucks at an Uber trendy gourmet shop in soho (nyc)
After thinking about it and reflecting on these things I’ve seen in use, I think the internal spout is intended to allow steam to pass with no condensate leaving the pan (and/or putting out a cooking fire). Foods would heat faster than in pans without the spout, and some aroma (from the steam) can flavor what’s put atop. For hotpot fondue/shabushabu, even a weak fire would keep the broth hotter between dips.
Not sure if you are referring to these Yunnan steam clay pots. Some people do add water upfront to speed up the process. So it can definitely be done in that way, but what makes it unique (and also the most prized approach) is not to add water and simply let the steam condenses and form the soup.
Put the ingredients without adding water
Definitely without adding water is the key. I haven’t added water from the beginning to test the difference, but the broth from the no water added method is memorable.