OK, so this has been bothering me for a while.
California recently passed a law requiring that you either use a re-usable carry out bag at the market or pay for one. Makes sense from an environment view I guess. But… you can use 100 of the small plastic bags available in every produce department and nobody cares. Is this just an ‘at least we’re doing SOMETHING’ thing or am I missing a point here?
If the reasoning is similar to that in the UK, then I suspect it’s about doing “something”. In the English part of the country, bags are now charged at 5p each. The success of the scheme shows in that it has resulted in an 85% reduction in use.
This is true, but I don’t see the clear plastic produce bags lying in the street or snagged on tree branches. So maybe it’s - at least partly - litter-related. 'Cause here’s what I see from my window right this second: a tree sporting a white plastic bag and a black plastic bag.
I am guessing “one step at a time” which is very similar to “at least we are doing something”. Sometime it is difficult to implement everything at the same time, and sometime there are unknown/unpredicted consequence, so it sense to do so in steps.
That article reads like it was written by the marketing department of the Plastics Industry Association.
Do British markets use the lightweight, smaller plastic bags we have here for all produce? If so, do they charge for them? Here they’re free even where the bigger (carry-out) size have been done away with. The ones charged for now are USUALLY heavy-weight bags, larger than the ones banned. The cost seems to be 10¢ in most places here in CA.
I’d say “yes” - although it’s some years since I shopped in an American supermarket and can’t recall how your bags compared with our bags. And, yes, as mentioned earlier, those are the ones now charged for. With the significant reduction in usage, it has to be regarded as a success.
Here’s a cradle to grave study:
I switched off when I saw that it was going to be 120 pages of government-speak.
I went and looked at my saved bags.
The meat/vegetable bags are #2- meaning (relatively) safe and household recyclable.
The grocery sacks are #3- meaning not recyclable and not food safe, more stuff like PVC pipe.
I shop at Rainbow Grocery Co-op in San Francisco; it provides two sizes of compostable bags for produce and bulk items like grains, flours, nuts, etc., at no charge. It also reimburses five cents for every produce bag brought from home.
You bring your own smal produce bags to the market? I’m impressed.
Actually, for whatever reason it’s happening, I’ve been noticing fewer and fewer of the small bag roll dispensers in my local markets’ produce areas. I haven’t seen any suggestion that they want us to just bring produce loose to the registers, but perhaps that’s the eventual plan.
Correction: 3, not 13, gallon bags
One problem is that many vegetables start to compost in the compostable bags and need to be transfered or at least removed before being refrigerated.
I think SF’s Rainbow Grocery Co-op gets part of the credit for instilling good habits: for years now it has credited 5 cents for every small bag customers bring.
My problem with the compostable bags is that the bags themselves start to compost and fall apart in the fridge. And I am a greenie in general.
But I do bring my plastic produce bags to the farmers market. Unless I am buying stuff that requires a clean bag, like salad greens or e.g. grapes, I don’t see a difference using new or used plastic bags in holding produce that requires cleaning and cooking, e.g. potatoes, squash, etc. Unless the bags are really dirty and disgusting, that is.