This speculation makes a fair bit of sense, considering the dearth of well-considered posts. CH staff have never been adept at writing anything. Witness their now-abandoned cookware “reviews”. I would go so far as to say most have shown themselves not to have deep knowledge or curiosity about food and cooking. Droids write droid posts–it may be as simple as that.
There used to be good CH staff (who drew a paycheck from CBSi), including Jacqueline (spelling?) and Dave - they were Houndish and contributed valuable information to the community, as well as being paid employees.
Today it’s a hard call: I don’t get the sense that the visible paid staff (marssy, pat, Deborah, VIPg) are Hounds or even terribly interested in food. But that’s a hard call - they might be posting under different names for all we know.
It does look like they’re bringing on some outside, paid writers for features / articles.
Harters
(John Hartley - a culinary patriot, cooking and eating in northwest England)
126
There’s absolutely no need for them to be particularly interested in the subject. They do specific jobs that are more about general management and their skill should be in those areas. I would rather they knew their craft than knew one end of an onion from the other.
I had a good laugh just now. Someone posted (on a feedback topic @ CH) and one of the questions asked if they were concerned about the lack of new posts. The response was to say that they don’t share site statistics. I wasn’t sure for a second if I’d tuned into the presidential debate by mistake.
That was my post, I think. My list of problems led to a long back-and-forth with Marssy, and ended up with me trying to navigate the site for the first time on a smartphone. With no AdBlock in place, I now see what others are complaining about. While scrolling past ads, I accidentally tapped one, and now my phone probably has a tracking cookie from some egg merchant in England.
2 Likes
Harters
(John Hartley - a culinary patriot, cooking and eating in northwest England)
136
Apologies if this particular shenanigan has been discussed elsewhere.
I’ve just been having a nosy at CH’s “feedback” board. What they seem to be doing is closing threads which are complaining about the new design, saying that they want to collect all issues on a single thread. The shenanigan is that they are not merging that new thread into their collection thread. Effectively, that is burying a whole raft of complainings. I can only conclude that any report to senior management would be based solely on the collection thread - very substantially under-reporting the complaints. Shabby and disingenuous.
Technically speaking, the “feedback” is for the moderators and designers to take notice and address issue. Basically, it is a mailbox for them. Now, on this issue, they just don’t want your feedback anymore.
The latest CH bug post is priceless. Can’t wait to see if it’s still there in the morning.
" mc michael about 1 hour ago
There seem to be content bugs.
I can’t find a 20% traffic increase. What’s with that?
I can’t find a 5X increase in content production. What’s with that?
I can’t grasp the vision. What’s with that?
Is Georges still there? I miss his updates.
Full 360 management of the business unit
Managed all aspects of P&L, business and product strategy and day-to-day operations
Developed a new vision to drive growth via a content platform for users seeking to get more into food
Aligned Product/Engineering/Community/Editorial to the new strategy and increased traffic by more than 20% YoY
Streamlined the Editorial process to increase content production 5x while maintaining cost under control and achieving profitability on the editorial content
Merged the Chow and Chowhound brands into a single unified property from both a user and technology stand point
Restructured the team and made key hires to execute on this vision"