FDA to phase out artificial food dyes

.

The FDA currently allows 36 food color additives, including eight synthetic dyes. In January, the agency announced that the dye known as Red 3 — used in candies, cakes and some medications — would be banned in food by 2027 because it caused cancer in laboratory rats.

Artificial dyes are used widely in U.S. foods. In Canada and in Europe — where synthetic colors are required to carry warning labels — manufacturers mostly use natural substitutes.

Hours before the announcement, the International Dairy Foods Association said its members would voluntarily eliminate artificial colors in milk, cheese and yogurt products sold to U.S. school meal programs by July 2026.

But other industry groups didn’t pledge any quick changes.

In the past, FDA officials said the threat of legal action from the food industry required the government to have significant scientific evidence before banning additives. Red 3 was banned from cosmetics more than three decades before it was stripped from food and medicine. It took five decades for the FDA to ban brominated vegetable oil because of health concerns.

Some of the state laws banning synthetic dyes in school meals have aggressive timelines. West Virginia’s ban, for example, prohibits red, yellow, blue and green artificial dyes in school meals starting Aug. 1. A broader ban will extend the restrictions to all foods sold in the state on Jan. 1, 2028.

In place of synthetic dyes, food makers can use natural hues made from beets, algae and crushed insects and pigments from purple sweet potatoes, radishes and red cabbage.

1 Like

I am completely fine with ditching artificial dyes. It’s about freakin’ time.

3 Likes

Some of it is just astounding. Or maybe all of it.

Red #3 is used to make things orange. Wild guess, someone might reject via EO the ban because they like orange dye.:stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:

1 Like

Cosmetics and food regulations are done by different parts of the FDA (and different regulation (timelines)) which can cause seemingly different outcomes. Unfortunately FDA can’t change these regulations, approval processes etc without Congress (and that hasn’t worked terribly well for the last 30 years).
In this particular case, the food additive was approve based on at that time existing data (which didn’t show clear evidence wrt cancer) and only had to approve for cosmetics much later and at that time much more additional data (which often takes many years to generate) was available with much clearer link towards cancer. Unfortunately, it is very complicated for FDA to remove a once approved additive without help from congress etc. (And with this additive there was in addition a lot of industry lobbying involved as it is so much used everywhere that it stalled any progress in Congress and/or FDA)