Let me give you two typical examples of milder forms and maybe you will see what I mean.
I ate in an Ethiopia restaurant in USA. I used my hands because it is customary to do so for Ethiopia foods. No knife or fork was provided, despite that this was a restaurant in US.
I suppose I often bow my head to sushi chefs as I enter to sushi restaurants even through they are in US. Bowing is more of a Japanese custom than an American custom.
So I see slurping noodle as in a relatively milder customary action (or if you want to call it an offense), and it is not a fundamental moral issue, same situation for eating with hands and head bowing. Or in another words, they are really one cultural custom vs another cultural custom (say eating with knife and fork vs eating with hands). Eating with knife and fork vs eating with hands is not a moral issue for me. I do not base my character on these choices.
Thanks for bringing this up. If I understand your question correctly, you are asking about an action which is illegal (locking people in). I think that get back to my other original point. For more serious issues, it is ok to be upset at these issues regardless where the actions take place. That is why, for me, eating dogs or eating human (cannibalism) will get me upset regardless of the locations. I see these things as fundamental moral issues, and as such, culture does not trump moral.
[quote=âThimes, post:15, topic:1150, full:trueâ]
I also donât have any Asian friends that slurp (as someone else said) - makes me wonder if it isnât as common in Asia as the hipster crowd like to profess. Or maybe it is a âblue collarâ custom in Asia that is going out of vogue. [/quote]
Yeah, that was me, and I seriously donât know anyone who slurps. As for the spoon method, when Iâm being polite I use the spoon. Yes, you simply lift the spoon and swirl a small portion of noodles into it, and then use the chopsticks to sweep the noodles into their mouth. Still no slurping involved.