Oh, they all taste different; but all the American micros , though different in profile, have the malt haze, as I call it. I believe it’s just from a simple lack of aging. The beer tastes incomplete. I can’t get to the finer details of the beer through this haze.
I’ve been wanting US success for years. I’ve tried lagers from (as far as i can remember): Sprecher, Sierra Nevada, Rogue, Summit, New Belgium, New Glarus, Rockwell Beer Co., Lakefront Brewery, among many others. Forgettable. All of them. Malt haze. Is it the malt itself, lack of time to mature, water? Wish I had the time to experiment. I get no malt character out of these, because of the haze. If I see Death and Taxes, I’ll grab one. But, I’m guessing, the haze will be there. I only suspect aging, because my old outlet used to have great discount deals on older brews, most micro/craft. So, I’d buy a discounted beer that was aged for another 6-10 months from the time it was made.
Have you made beer? The haze tastes just like the spend yeast cells at the bottom of the carboy. Know what I mean? It’s like you added the dead yeast to the bottle, and it veils any nuance from me. Can’t get past it. This flavor does not exist, even in weak ass Heineken, or mediocre Urquell. That’s why I’d rather drink a mediocre Urquell, than a whatever US micro. Breckenridge, was one I tried recently, Brek Lager. Haze.
This isn’t just a lager thing. I buy a stout from up the road, just because I want to keep those guys brewing. Not as pronounced as in lagers, but the haze exists there, too. Guiness is clean. You can taste the malt, unobtrusively. The haze gets in the way of our ales, too.
So, drink whatever micro/craft next to the Urquell, and instead of this note, that note, think the one full note you’re left with. Urquell-clean, little hop spice, fair head, love the nose. Victory Prima Pils- astringent, astringent, astringent. All I’m getting. Had micros in: Texas, Colorado, AZ, MN, MI, NM, TN, WI, IA, CA, MO, prolly more. Astringent.
Then I read reviews with people saying this brew is amazing, when the safe beers were so-so. Try the beer they say is amazing, and always go back to the safe beers, because they don’t have that obtrusive, astringent haze. I like a clean finish, not a film on my tongue. Had countless flights in countless pubs. Astringent.
Maybe it’s just me, but friends of mine, who have been consuming for years, have agreed. We can make a Squirrel Nut Zipper raspberry/chicory/walnut hull/possum urine sour imperial stout. Just can’t make anything close to flippin’ DAB. Eh, I’ve had some crappers from Germany, Netherlands. Never ever had that astringency, though. Bitte sucks; but not for that reason. Just sucks.
Oh, and session these lagers, it’s hangover hell. Ice for the head, and shave the tongue. The haze started with the first micro/crafts. Part of our brewing tradition, now. The more of 'em I drink, the m ore fervently I return to safe. I guess safe means clean, to me.
Last time I visited my bro in Texas, all his pals said I HAD to try Shiner Bock. This beer tasted almost identical to the $4/case beer I drank in college (Huber Bock.) Whatever. I’ve coached a lot of kids in my life and one of my old wrestlers new I liked different beers, so, when he went to Texas for work, he called me on his way back home and said he had a surprise beer for me. I said, “let me guess, Shiner.” He goes "you a-hole!!"Love that kid.
The other kicker for me is, one of the first, Augsburger, was better than most of these greats. I wish Joe Huber was still alive. Used to stop at Sprecher brewery when it was on the river in Milwaukee. Randy Sprecher was a very generous owner. He got us college kids giddy on his brews. Those were better than the new lagers, IMHO. I really thought the day would come when we’d rival Euro lagers. Loooong way to go, IMO.
All I got.