No. It doesn’t take a futurist to see that future–of ever-increasing and accelerating automation.[quote=“bmorecupcake, post:37, topic:8676”]
If it means healthier and fresher food for more people, then it’s a good thing in my opinion.
[/quote]
Utilitarianism aside, your premise here is uncertain. What we may end up with is skillfully processed, standardized ingredients–even a few universal ones–that result in foods which look, feel and taste like healthier and fresher hand-made foods.
Automated breadmaker appliances were once the Instant Pot of their day, and in nearly every kitchen (now in every landfill). I thought they made decent, if ugly, bread. I expect someone will offer a “smart” breadmaker, and also that it will still be a far cry from being able to emulate a human professional baker.
Larger bakeries are also themselves already mostly automated–and it shows. There is a parallel with wineries here: it is possible to automate and scale up wine production to industrial levels, but it is very hard to do in a way that results in a finished wine equal to one made by small(er), artisanal winemakers. In both cases, you’re paying for (at least the chance at) something better, that isn’t fully automated.
I’m sorry if labor concerns have frustrated your pursuit of a regular bakery. Thankfully, I haven’t seen/tasted the kinds of inconsistency you note. In fact, in Seattle we have seen a large increase in both the # and quality of bread and pastry bakeries.
As for the future of food, we’ll see. Will the replicator make my kitchen or car smell good? Can it dust Wahine’s kissable forehead with flour? Does my model replicator come with the lame attachment that does anything I want? Does it flirt with me when it hands over my boule? Could it offer me a Kouign aman to tide me over?
IMO, the future will not be as bright if we can have anything we want, whenever we want it, by pushing a button.
Aloha,
Kaleo